0411, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Auditing Virtual Appliances – An Untapped Source Of 0-days

René Pfeiffer/ November 4, 2013/ Conference, Security

System administrators and information security researcher often have to deal with appliances. Almost every organisation and company has a couple of magical black boxes sitting around. Usually they are connected to the network, and they do important stuff (such as filtering things, checking content, and the like). In the old days testing these appliances for their security record was hard. You had to open it, do a lot of tedious reverse engineering in order to understand how it works, and then conduct your tests to do your analysis. Fortunately the future is here, and so is a new form factor: virtual appliances! At DeepSec 2013 Stefan Viehböck of SEC Consult will talk about the advantages of having a virtual appliance to deconstruct. Virtual appliances aren’t very different from their embedded cousins, judged from the

0211, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Hack The Gibson – Exploiting Supercomputers

René Pfeiffer/ November 2, 2013/ Conference

Compromising and controlling a large number of computers is a big advantage for attackers. The best example are the botnets consisting of hundreds, thousands or millions of systems infected by malicious software. These herds of compromised nodes receive commands from Command & Control (C&C) servers. In a sense this is massive parallel computing, but unfortunately it isn’t used for scientific purposes. Instead these nodes send unsolicited e-mails (a.k.a. spam), perform Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, or do other tasks for their masters. The infection process is highly automated. Scripts looks for promising targets, attack them, install the botnet software, and add them to the herd’s network. Great. But what about infecting whole networks of nodes instead of nodes one by one? Modern supercomputers are based on a multi-node architecture. Individual nodes are part

0111, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Prism Break – The Value Of Online Identities

René Pfeiffer/ November 1, 2013/ Conference, Internet

We all have identities. We use them on a daily basis in our off-line world. Colleagues greet us at work, because they know who we are. Of course our family members know who we are. When it comes to the digital life-style our identity becomes a lot more complex and diverse. Web shops know what we like and suggest products we do not yet have. Social media sites suggest contacts that might match our interest (as do dating web sites). Frequently used search terms are processed to refine the results our favourite search engine presents us. Customisation and targeting is the key. Everything you do and communicate is processed like ore and the Big Data server farms refine your daily trails through the Internet and produce your online identity – which is a good

3110, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Easy Ways To Bypass Anti-Virus Systems

René Pfeiffer/ October 31, 2013/ Conference, Security, Stories

The Joys of Detecting Malicious Software Malicious software is all around us. It permeates the Internet by riding on data transmissions. Once you communicate, you risk getting in touch with malware (another name for malicious software). This is why every single one of us, be it individual, company or organisation, runs anti-virus software. The idea is to have specialised software detect malware, so all the bad things are kept out of your network and away from your end-points. So much for the theory. In practice any self-respecting attacker can evade anti-virus filters by a variety of means, depending on their skills and resources. Security researchers know about this fact. Stuxnet and Flame were a proof for sceptics (and a failure of the whole anti-virus industry). How can this be? Well, Attila Marosi (GovCERT Hungary)

3010, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Uncovering your Trails – Privacy issues of Bluetooth Devices

René Pfeiffer/ October 30, 2013/ Conference, Security

Bluetooth has been around for a while. Hackers and security researchers (such as trifinite.org and others) immediately investigated the weaknesses of protocol and implementations – The specifications have evolved, but so has the proliferation of Bluetooth-capable devices. Smartphones, dumb phones, computers, bulletin boards, media players, tablets, game consoles, headsets, and many more support Bluetooth wireless communication. Even though bugs of the past were fixed, the widespread capabilities of devices allow for a lot of creative use by adversaries. At DeepSec 2013 Verónica Valeros and Garcia Sebastian will give you an update about Bluetooth hacking and your exposure to attackers. When we think about our own privacy, we usually think of our private data, passwords, personal stuff, web pages we have accessed or phone calls we have made. Information about our behaviour in real life (where

2610, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Workshop: Effective IDS/IPS Auditing And Testing With Finux

René Pfeiffer/ October 26, 2013/ Conference, Security, Training

A major part of information security is to deal with intrusions. It doesn’t matter if you have to anticipate them, detect them, or desperately wish to avoid them. They are a part of your infosec life. This is why gentle software developers, security researchers, and vendors have created intrusion detection/preventi0n systems. It’s all there for your benefit. The trouble is that once you buy and deploy and IDS/IPS system, its dashboard looks a lot like the one from the space shuttle or a fighter jet. You can do a lot, you can combine a lot more, and you see all kinds of blinking lights when you turn everything on. That’s probably not what you want. But there is help. Arron ‘Finux’ Finnon of Alba13 Research Labs will conduct a training on effective IDS/IPS auditing

2510, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Hacking Medical Devices

René Pfeiffer/ October 25, 2013/ Conference, Security

Modern information technology has already entered the field of medical technology. Few hospitals can operate without power and network connectivity. This is why information security has followed the deployment of hardware and software. Next to the infrastructure present there exists a multitude of communication protocols that increase the attack surface. Hospitals and other medical facilities have to address this issue. News of compromised systems are bad for the administration and the patients. Securing systems enters a new dimension once you consider equipment such as medical pumps, diagnostic systems and anaesthesia machines which directly interact with the patient. Tampering with the dosage of the medication can result in very serious consequences, regardless if on purpose or by accident. Dick Cheney had the wireless capabilities of his pacemaker disabled in 2007 for fears of attacks against his

2310, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Psychology of Security – a Research Programme

René Pfeiffer/ October 23, 2013/ Conference

Have you ever considered the impact of the human mind on information security? Since our brain also deals with information,it should be an integral part of defence. Let’s take a look at psychology: At DeepSec 2013 Stefan Schumacher will give you an introduction into the psychology of security and why we need to improve scientific research in this particular field. Most research about security is done in Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematics and is about technology, algorithms and computability. However, all security issues can be traced back to human behaviour. Be it Social Engineering, the choice of weak passwords, users leaving the password on a note-it attached to the TFT, admins using MD5 as a password hash or developers ignoring testing regulations. Humans are making decisions, not computers. Therefore, security is defined by

2110, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Workshop: Hands On Exploit Development (Part 2)

René Pfeiffer/ October 21, 2013/ Conference, Stories

Unless you buy ready-made exploits or do security research (you know, the tedious task of testing systems and code, findings bugs and assessing their impact) you may wonder where they come from. To show you how to exploit a vulnerability and how to get to an exploit, we have asked Georgia Weidman for an example. She will be conducting the Hands On Exploit Development training. Early in my infosec education I took a class with a lab portion systems with known vulnerabilities. One system that I had difficulty exploiting was a Windows 7 host with HP Power Manager 4.2.6 which is subject to CVE-2009-2685. There is no Metasploit Module for this issue, but I was able to find some public exploit code on Exploit-db. The exploit calls out explicitly that it has been tested

2010, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Workshop: Hands On Exploit Development (Part 1)

René Pfeiffer/ October 20, 2013/ Conference, Training

Software bugs evolve, just like their animal counterparts. Lesser bugs impact usability or are simple malfunctions. Once a bug impacts the security it is called a vulnerability. This means that something major is broken and that the internal logic can be manipulated to produce undesirable effects. Vulnerabilities can be exploited to create deterministic effects such as bypassing security checks, elevating privileges or other things. Exploits are the biggest bugs around. They have to work every time (at least with the software version affected by the bug/vulnerability), they need to insert specific code with a given purpose, and they should not compromise the functionality of the software (since you don’t want to be noticed) – So there is software development involved. Georgia Weidman will teach you how to get from a bug via a vulnerability

1910, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: Finux’s Historical Tour Of IDS Evasion, Insertions, and Other Oddities

René Pfeiffer/ October 19, 2013/ Conference, Security, Stories

The SANS Institute offers the article The History and Evolution of Intrusion Detection in its Reading Room. The article was published in 2001. It starts with the phrase „during the past five years…“. We now have 2013. Why is it important to examine the history of a technology which certainly is well established and widely deployed in information security? Well, first of all even to this day many people have a problem with what intrusion detection really is. Detecting an intrusion is not the same as intrusion detection. Secondly not everything marketed as intrusion detection system really detects intrusions. How can this be? The answer can be found by attending Arron „Finux“ Finnon‘s Historical Tour Of IDS Evasion, Insertions, and Other Oddities at DeepSec 2013. He will address the history of intrusion detection along the lines

1510, 2013

DeepSec 2013 Talk: The Economics Of False Positives

René Pfeiffer/ October 15, 2013/ Conference

Ever since networks got attacked the victims have thought of ways to detect and prevent attacks. Packet filters were the first idea. Closing a port meant to worry less about applications listening on them. So the trouble of protecting moved to the services that were still exposed. Filtering got more complex, protocols were inspected, signatures were introduced, intrusion detection systems were born. Great – but the attacks didn’t disappear. Instead you got alerts, a lot of them. Some were caused by real attacks, some were false alerts. Enter false positives. Setting off false alarms is a tried and true military tactic. After a couple of false alarms the sentries will probably be less alert. Translated to information security this means that alerts (and log files) will be ignored after a couple of false alerts.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: